News

HDA Media And Political Bulletin – 26 April 2016

The smoke starts to clear for hub and spoke dispensing

22 April 2016, The Pharmaceutical Journal

 

The Pharmaceutical Journal discusses the concerns over the hub-and-spoke consultation launched by the UK Government. Highlighting the confusions between hub-and-spoke and centralised dispensing, this editorial clarifies the distinction between the two models to outline the benefits and disadvantages of hub-and-spoke dispensing. While The Pharmaceutical Journal welcomes a technology which could assemble prescriptions more accurately and more quickly than a human for the benefit of patients, questions over its application are also raised.

 

PSNC publishes counter proposal

25 April 2016, PSNC

 

PSNC has published a summary of the counter proposal it has made to the Department of Health in response to the Government’s proposals for community pharmacy. The counter proposal sets out how community pharmacy could be used to generate savings to the NHS without a cut in pharmacy funding.

.

Parliamentary Coverage

 

There is no Parliamentary Coverage today.

 

Full Coverage

The smoke starts to clear for hub and spoke dispensing

22 April 2016, The Pharmaceutical Journal

The UK government’s push towards hub-and-spoke dispensing (as expressed in its community pharmacy reforms letter dated 17 December 2015) has caused concern, particularly among representatives of the independent community pharmacy sector. One of the challenges in the discussion lies in the definitions. The terms ‘hub and spoke’ and ‘centralised dispensing’ have been used interchangeably, including by The Pharmaceutical Journal, and this confusion is weakening the arguments on both sides.

Hub and spoke is a fairly clear concept. In a hub-and-spoke system, prescriptions are brought or sent to the spoke pharmacies, and the information is sent (generally electronically) to the hub pharmacy. The prescription is assembled at the hub, whether as boxes and packets of drugs in a bag or as individual tablets in a monitored dosage system (MDS) tray. The assembled prescriptions are delivered back to the spoke, where the pharmacist dispenses the drugs and offers advice to the patient or their representative. The definition of centralised dispensing is more ambiguous, and should perhaps be applied to the concept of prescriptions being assembled and dispensed at a hub and delivered to the patient by post or, potentially in the future, to a collection point such as a secure locker. Interactions take place online or over the telephone. It is this concept that has been referred to, somewhat disparagingly, as the ‘Amazonisation’ of pharmacy.

One of the drivers behind the government backing for hub-and-spoke dispensing is the idea that it will create major efficiencies and savings in community pharmacy. The Pharmaceutical Journal has given its support to the innovation behind hub-and-spoke dispensing in the past (2015;295:420). If a machine can assemble prescriptions more accurately and more quickly than a human then the technology should be exploited for the benefit of patients.

But questions remain and community pharmacists are right to be cautious. There is not enough evidence yet that the envisaged efficiencies will materialise. Hub-and-spoke dispensing will only be used for repeat prescriptions, and assembling these is not necessarily the most time consuming part of a pharmacist’s job. There are other important steps in the dispensing process, such as clinical and accuracy checks, which arguably take more time than picking the product off the shelf.

The process also may not be suitable for cold chain drugs and controlled substances, and automated systems struggle with liquids and with large or heavy items — but these problems should not be insurmountable. On account of the shipping time, turnaround will generally be around 48 hours, at least for now, so it cannot be used for short notice and emergency prescriptions. Pharmacists have also raised concerns about the security of data and medicines between the two sites, the costs of set up, and the validity of automated picking, as well as how hub and spoke can meet the terms of the forthcoming EU Falsified Medicines Directive.

Hub-and-spoke dispensing certainly has potential to improve reproducibility, particularly for repetitive manual processes such as creating MDS trays, and the automated systems have accuracy checks and traceability built in at each step of the process. The early proponents of the concept have also reported that it gives their pharmacists more time to be able to interact with their patients, and set up and support new services.

Automated hubs are still in their infancy and there are not enough data to assess the full impact of the technology. But if the benefits of speed and accuracy can be translated across the sector, opportunities will be created for greater not less interaction between pharmacists and patients.

 

PSNC publishes counter proposal

25 April 2016, PSNC

 

PSNC has today published a summary of the counter proposal it has made to the Department of Health in response to the Government’s proposals for community pharmacy in 2016/17 and beyond.

The counter proposal sets out how community pharmacy services, including an emergency supply of medicines service, could be used to generate the savings the NHS needs to make through pharmacy, without a cut in funding.

PSNC’s proposal includes plans that would enable pharmacies to make savings in the prescribing budget and to save on costs for out of hours GP services. PSNC has also proposed payments that would reward the provision of high quality pharmacy services, in response to the Department’s aim to alter community pharmacy funding distribution mechanisms.

Further details of the counter proposal are copied below.

Background

 

An important part of PSNC’s response to the letter of 17th December 2015 has been a counter proposal setting out how community pharmacy could use its unique skills, accessibility and contact with the public and patients to reduce NHS costs and improve quality.

PSNC’s proposal includes a number of possible community pharmacy services which, if implemented together, could lead to savings worth at least as much as the Government’s proposed £170m cut to community pharmacy funding. In this way community pharmacy could contribute to the efficiencies needed in the health service, as well as reducing the substantial levels of medicines waste, without the need for a blunt funding cut that will damage the services patients need and use.

PSNC’s counter proposal sets out how community pharmacy could generate savings in two areas:

The NHS prescribing budget; and

Costs of out of hours GP services.

Savings to the prescribing budget could be made through a not-dispensed scheme and a therapeutic substitution service, supplemented by generic substitution, a focus on reducing waste in care homes and a campaign and audit on unwanted medicines. Costs of out of hours services could be reduced by an Emergency Supply service. This briefing sets out more information on all of these proposed services.

Alongside these service developments, PSNC has also proposed the introduction of payments linked to quality. This would reward pharmacy contractors that provide a range of services in a high quality manner.

1. Proposals to generate savings in the NHS prescribing budget and to reduce medicines waste

 

Not-dispensed scheme

 

The objective of this scheme would be to reduce NHS expenditure on medicines and appliances through not dispensing prescription items where the pharmacy team determines with the patient that they already have sufficient stock of the medicine or appliance at home.

Following discussions with the patient regarding their repeat medication or appliance, contractors would mark any items not required by the patient at that time as not-dispensed in a way that can be easily identified by the Pricing Authority. For each non-dispensed item, contractors would receive the usual professional fees plus a small additional non-dispensing fee.

Therapeutic substitution service

 

The objective of this service would be to reduce NHS expenditure on medicines by community pharmacists recommending alternative products to prescribers following the dispensing of a product on a target list.

These suggested substitutions would be based on a list of ‘costly’ medicines with suitable alternatives, based on cost and efficacy grounds, to propose to the prescriber. The pharmacist would send GP practices proposals on alternative prescribing options for individual patients. Where the prescriber agreed to amend the patient’s prescription, the pharmacist would then clearly explain the reason for the change to the patient, providing reassurance on the change and advice on the use of the new product. This face to face discussion with patients would help to increase the likelihood of patient acceptance of the amendment and their subsequent adherence to the amended regimen.

The target list would be created nationally but could also be flexible to reflect local priorities.  It is envisaged that it would cover a range of areas for example:

Divested products, where prescribers may not be aware of the significant levels of price inflation that have occurred with individual products;

Therapeutic gains, where more effective treatments are available at equivalent or lower cost; and

Specials, where licensed alternative products may be available.

In the long-term this service could be developed to further support the work of local Medicines Optimisation teams to reduce inappropriate and inefficient prescribing.

Generic substitution service

 

The objective of this service would be to reduce NHS expenditure by allowing community pharmacists to dispense cheaper generic equivalents in the place of prescribed branded products. A list of medicines that could be generically substituted would be agreed at a national level, ensuring inclusion of only those products where it is safe and clinically appropriate to make a substitution.  The pharmacist would discuss the substitution with the patient at the point of dispensing, to ensure that they understand the reasons for the substitution. This conversation is vital to ensure patient acceptance of the substitution and their subsequent adherence to the amended regimen.

Development of the list of medicines would require consultation with interested parties, but it could be based on the list and approach to substitution which was implemented in Ireland in 2013; significant savings have been made since the introduction of the service.

Care homes

 

The objective of this service would be to reduce NHS expenditure on medicines and appliances by community pharmacists identifying excess prescribing and supply of medicines and dressings to care homes.  Pharmacists would need to conduct a regular review of the supplies to care homes and the stock being held at the home in order to identify excess stock. Pharmacists may also facilitate the use of bulk prescriptions for the supply of some commonly used ‘as required’ items and recommendations to prescribe potential alternatives to costlier products.

Unwanted medicines campaign and audit

 

The objective of this proposal would be to reduce NHS expenditure on medicines by raising the awareness of patients and prescribers about waste medicines through a campaign and audit of waste medicines returned to pharmacies. Each year community pharmacies would run a month-long campaign in which they would encourage patients to return any unwanted medicines to them. Pharmacy teams would then audit and report on the waste returned to them and share learnings with local prescribers to help them to minimise future medicines wastage.

2. Proposal to reduce NHS spend on out of hours services

 

Emergency supply of medicines service

 

The objective of this service would be to reduce NHS expenditure on out of hours GP services by allowing community pharmacies to make emergency supplies of medicines to patients at NHS expense. Patients requiring medicines could obtain supplies without the need for an urgent prescription, which during the out of hours period would save them visiting an out of hours GP. The service could also receive referrals of patients from NHS 111.

3. Proposals for payments linked to quality

 

As part of the proposals for community pharmacy in 2016/17 and beyond, the Department of Health set out an intention to alter the distribution of community pharmacy funding, replacing the current complex system of payments with a single activity fee for each prescription item supplied.

PSNC believes this proposal is a retrograde step, as it would incentivise pharmacies to maximise supply of prescriptions over the provision of other services to patients and combined with the cost pressures affecting the sector, even excluding the proposed cuts, this will lead to a reduction in services to patients, with consequential increases in demands on other NHS and care budgets. The DH proposal would also appear to be contrary to their statement that there is a need for a clinically focussed community pharmacy service that is better integrated with primary care.

PSNC wants to develop funding delivery systems that specifically target higher payments to pharmacies providing a range of high quality services. We have made initial proposals to DH setting out how such a quality payment might work. Suggestions of possible eligibility criteria for quality payments currently under consideration include:

  • Having a consultation room that meets MUR/NMS requirements;
  • Provision of Advanced Services (MUR, NMS and flu vaccination);
  • Maintenance of an up to date NHS Choices profile and NHS 111 Directory of Services listing;
  • Having a programme for the provision of public health interventions to meet local population needs
  • Training staff as health champions;
  • Making interventions on prescriptions as part of the therapeutic substitution and not-dispensed services (described above);
  • Participation in available locally commissioned services;
  • Access to the Summary Care Record; and
  • Participation in an annual medicines waste campaign and audit (as described above).
HDA Media And Political Bulletin – 26 April 2016

From Factory to Pharmacy

As part of our mission to build awareness, understanding and appreciation of the vital importance of the healthcare distribution sector, we developed an infographic explaining the availability of medicines. It identifies the factors that can impact drug supply, as well as the measures that HDA members undertake day in, day out to help mitigate the risks of patients not receiving their medicines.

See the Infographic

Apply to become a Member

Membership of the HDA guarantees your organisation:

  • Access to leading policy and industry forums of debate and discussion
  • Invitations to a range of networking industry events organised through the year, including an Annual Conference and a Business Day
  • Representation on HDA working parties, including the Members’ Liaison Group
  • A daily Political and Media Bulletin and HDA Newsletters
  • Access to HDA policy documents and all sections of the HDA website
  • Branding and marketing opportunities
Apply Now

Already a Member?